In EXTREME fairness to Mega, he is PRETTY MUCH THE ONLY THING GOING IN DETROIT. So keying on him doesn't exactly take much thought.. lol
Showing posts with label NFL. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NFL. Show all posts
Called Peanut Tillman this last week @ covering CJ. Looks like @RSherman_25 has the same idea X Optimus Prime
October 27, 2012Calvin Johnson Jr., football, NFL, nicknames, Pictures, Richard Sherman, Twitter
No comments

In EXTREME fairness to Mega, he is PRETTY MUCH THE ONLY THING GOING IN DETROIT. So keying on him doesn't exactly take much thought.. lol
Hat tip to my cousin @BasedGladman on this one X Tom Brady & Peyton Manning talk 'Elite Quarterbacks' (Parody)
October 05, 2012Ben Roethlisberger, Drew Brees, Eli Manning, humor, Mark Sanchez, Mick Vick, NFL, Peyton Manning, Phillip Rivers, Tim Tebow, Tom Brady, Tony Romo
No comments

(Video) @BMarshall video in response to @WarrenSapp's comments....
Pretty sure SportsCenter has/will cover this but yeah..
Hope they can talk like men when they do meet.... Warren did apologize..
Click below to go to the video since he did it on yfrog... (Their embedding html is screwed up..)
http://twitter.yfrog.com/fkvvgyrgtqzetiienrhqkpiez
(Picture) Damm near 10k fine for a missed doctor's appointment Kenny Britt? Well
actually...THE TITANS? "Cause they are the ones who levied the fine. Yeesh. I get it though. His health (and playing status) is pretty important so..
(He took the flick down but you know the screen shot....) He'll be aight though. Just like he said on his IG about his rims. Small thing to a giant.. *shrugs* Hope GODdell doesn't hit him for more money... *
*I know you are saying "Well if you did, then why did you put the pic up?" Would you have believed me without the pic? Oh..... If I was trying to be a dickhead about it though, I could have MADE THE POST SHOW UP IN HIS TWITTER FEED. I did not. So if it is found via an Internet search (like they don't already know he did it or some shit..HE PULLED THE PHOTO...DUH...They know..) that isn't on me per say..
(He took the flick down but you know the screen shot....) He'll be aight though. Just like he said on his IG about his rims. Small thing to a giant.. *shrugs* Hope GODdell doesn't hit him for more money... *
*I know you are saying "Well if you did, then why did you put the pic up?" Would you have believed me without the pic? Oh..... If I was trying to be a dickhead about it though, I could have MADE THE POST SHOW UP IN HIS TWITTER FEED. I did not. So if it is found via an Internet search (like they don't already know he did it or some shit..HE PULLED THE PHOTO...DUH...They know..) that isn't on me per say..
(Video/Audio) Oops... Gregg Williams audio..Welp that pretty much settles this one.. @ bounty issues
I just got in so excuse me if I am late... @ not hearing this. This is damming. Now, I am not saying he hasn't said ANYTHING that I haven't heard before though... Lets be clear. He crossed the line though. For sure..
So this is what Mike Wallace's asking price is...The 49ers inquired about Mike Wallace but ...
49ers Blog and Q&A: The 49ers inquired about Mike Wallace but ...
Let me be clear I knew it was high. I promise I did. I can also see why folks would be shying away from it. I mean, I'm not mad at Mike either. GET YOUR MONEY FAM. It's business. I also know that the Steelers probably won't pay him that much. At least I don't think so. I could be wrong and I know there are TONS OF YOU WHO HOPE I AM WRONG.
Again...I understand it. He should have been drafted higher and this is his way of making up that 'stagger'. No problem. He can command it. Or can he? @ the teams that passed on this alleged price tag. I wonder how 'off' this number is as well? 'Cause it can't be THAT FAR OFF. I know he wants over a 100 millie for the duration of his contract so my question is just how far off is this number...Anyway..read the article. Here is a piece..
How much? A league source said that Wallace, 25, wants a contract that surpasses the eight-year, $120 million deal that Larry Fitzgerald signed last year with the Cardinals. Combine that with the first-round pick any team that signs Wallace to an offer sheet would lose if the Steelers didn't match the offer, and you start to understand why we've heard so little about Wallace in the last week and a half.
That, of course, could change. Teams have another month to sign restricted free agents. But at that price, the 49ers aren't interested, and it's hard to imagine the Patriots, Bengals and Ravens paying that either.
Wallace ranked 11th in receiving yards last season with 1,193 yards, and he scored eight touchdowns. Fitzgerald ranked fourth with 1,411 yards and eight touchdowns. The Steelers placed a first-round tender worth $2.74 million on Wallace. If Wallace signs it, he'll become an unrestricted free agent next season and all 32 teams will be able to bid on him without the fear of losing a draft pick.
Read more here: http://blogs.sacbee.com/49ers/archives/2012/03/the-49ers-inquired-about-mike-wallace-but.html#storylink=cpy#storylink=cpy
Let me be clear I knew it was high. I promise I did. I can also see why folks would be shying away from it. I mean, I'm not mad at Mike either. GET YOUR MONEY FAM. It's business. I also know that the Steelers probably won't pay him that much. At least I don't think so. I could be wrong and I know there are TONS OF YOU WHO HOPE I AM WRONG.
Again...I understand it. He should have been drafted higher and this is his way of making up that 'stagger'. No problem. He can command it. Or can he? @ the teams that passed on this alleged price tag. I wonder how 'off' this number is as well? 'Cause it can't be THAT FAR OFF. I know he wants over a 100 millie for the duration of his contract so my question is just how far off is this number...Anyway..read the article. Here is a piece..
How much? A league source said that Wallace, 25, wants a contract that surpasses the eight-year, $120 million deal that Larry Fitzgerald signed last year with the Cardinals. Combine that with the first-round pick any team that signs Wallace to an offer sheet would lose if the Steelers didn't match the offer, and you start to understand why we've heard so little about Wallace in the last week and a half.
That, of course, could change. Teams have another month to sign restricted free agents. But at that price, the 49ers aren't interested, and it's hard to imagine the Patriots, Bengals and Ravens paying that either.
Wallace ranked 11th in receiving yards last season with 1,193 yards, and he scored eight touchdowns. Fitzgerald ranked fourth with 1,411 yards and eight touchdowns. The Steelers placed a first-round tender worth $2.74 million on Wallace. If Wallace signs it, he'll become an unrestricted free agent next season and all 32 teams will be able to bid on him without the fear of losing a draft pick.
Read more here: http://blogs.sacbee.com/49ers/archives/2012/03/the-49ers-inquired-about-mike-wallace-but.html#storylink=cpy#storylink=cpy
(Picture) LaRon Landry out here looking like a light skinned Ronnie Coleman...
He is a safety for the Washington Redskins.. in case you don't know.
Reminds me of when David Boston got ripped...
The criticism he is gonna get for this one. (and the testing..)
Reminds me of when David Boston got ripped...
The criticism he is gonna get for this one. (and the testing..)
Oh THEY HEARD ME.... Steelers close to re-signing @MaxStarks78
Steelers close to re-signing Max Starks
Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11277/1179726-100.stm#ixzz1ZuMugaRC
Steelers close to re-signing Max Starks
Tuesday, October 04, 2011
By Gerry Dulac , Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
The Steelers visited with former offensive tackle Max Starks tonight and are close to re-signing him to help their injury-plagued offensive line.
Starks, who was released before the start of training camp, was at the team's South Side facility tonight and will likely be signed to the 53-man roster, a team source told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
The Steelers will have to release a player to make room for Starks, who had been a full-time starter since the middle of the 2009 season.
Starks missed the second half of last season with a neck injury that kept him from working out during the offseason. That caused him to be overweight and out of shape and forced the Steelers to release him.
Starks, who was released before the start of training camp, was at the team's South Side facility tonight and will likely be signed to the 53-man roster, a team source told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
The Steelers will have to release a player to make room for Starks, who had been a full-time starter since the middle of the 2009 season.
Starks missed the second half of last season with a neck injury that kept him from working out during the offseason. That caused him to be overweight and out of shape and forced the Steelers to release him.
Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11277/1179726-100.stm#ixzz1ZuMugaRC
(Pictures) As a Steelers fan, you KNOW I can appreciate this. @BrittanyDailey in her throwback Steelers shirt..
Football. Is. Back. For. Real. Games that COUNT. First up.for the Steelers? The Ravens.
The Hair is healthy. When he is healthy...yeah... |
I know folks are talking about his back....If he can walk, he will play. Well. |
Both guys in the picture will hopefully get their share of the rock. |
This WHOLE UNIT. We need 'em to play well. Period. Hopefully they set the tone. |
Mike Wallace. I imagine him and Jimmy will be locked up with each other. @ the Ravens rookie |
@reggie_bush...speaks on his first game in Mia......Interview...
Reggie Bush Talks About His First Game in Miami from Kim Bokamper on Vimeo.
Pretty interesting actually..