Showing posts with label Tiger Woods. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tiger Woods. Show all posts
Oh, btw...Earl was talking to his wife in that 'commercial'.
Not Tiger. They did a good job on it (the commercial itself). Are ya'll gonna go at their necks like you have Tiger's though? Probably not.
Link:
The audio used for the Earl and Tiger Woods ad was taken from a 2004 interview of Earl Woods during which he was talking about his wife Kultida, not Tiger. When Earl says "I am more prone to be inquisitive, to promote discussion. I want to find out what you're thinking was, I want to find out what your feelings are and did you learn anything?", he is describing his personality in comparison to Kultida's.
It's safe to say the voiceover used for the Earl and Tiger commercial is completely out of context to the subject at hand and adds a heavy dose of ammunition to the arsenal of the ad's naysayers.
The way the ad is presented we are made to believe Earl is speaking directly to his son. Admonishing him. Offering fatherly advice. And in the commercial, we see Tiger looking like a chastised child.
Clearly this is not the case. The commercial was cobbled together by Wieden + Kennedy and presented as something it's not. It's a lie. A fabrication. Earl is not talking to Tiger. Tiger isn't feeling remorse in the ad. He's reacting to words his father didn't even speak to him.
Though controversial, at least some merit could have been placed on the ad's concept had Earl actually been talking about Tiger in the interview. Now it's just another example of an agency bending the truth for its own gain.
Link:
The audio used for the Earl and Tiger Woods ad was taken from a 2004 interview of Earl Woods during which he was talking about his wife Kultida, not Tiger. When Earl says "I am more prone to be inquisitive, to promote discussion. I want to find out what you're thinking was, I want to find out what your feelings are and did you learn anything?", he is describing his personality in comparison to Kultida's.
It's safe to say the voiceover used for the Earl and Tiger commercial is completely out of context to the subject at hand and adds a heavy dose of ammunition to the arsenal of the ad's naysayers.
The way the ad is presented we are made to believe Earl is speaking directly to his son. Admonishing him. Offering fatherly advice. And in the commercial, we see Tiger looking like a chastised child.
Clearly this is not the case. The commercial was cobbled together by Wieden + Kennedy and presented as something it's not. It's a lie. A fabrication. Earl is not talking to Tiger. Tiger isn't feeling remorse in the ad. He's reacting to words his father didn't even speak to him.
Though controversial, at least some merit could have been placed on the ad's concept had Earl actually been talking about Tiger in the interview. Now it's just another example of an agency bending the truth for its own gain.
I promise that this is how the Tiger commercial should have went & his take on Michael Steele
| The Colbert Report | Mon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c | |||
| Tiger's Nike Commercial | ||||
| www.colbertnation.com | ||||
| ||||
| The Colbert Report | Mon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c | |||
| The Word - Affirmative Inaction | ||||
| www.colbertnation.com | ||||
| ||||
Jemele Hill said it best. "He shoulda just came back and played.."
Here we go again- DMX. ESPN rehashing the whole incident. Running them stupid clips and showing his truck all smashed up. Wondering if 'he can recover from this?" Saying all the cliches, letting Skip Bayless talk and them other goofy announcers they have.
I am not really understanding who it is or why he needs to 'apologize' via this press conference. I mean, the only person(s) that he needs to apologize to is his wife. After that, there is no need. Those that don't want to roll with him anymore through the endorsement deals, the 'I love Tiger' bandwagons and such have JUMPED ship long time ago. They are already saying he can't 'get back what he lost' so what is the point of making this statement? I don't get it.
Oh wait, that's right. He needs to SUFFER. LOL All the 'perfect patties' of the world want to see him begging. Get their last kicks in before they 'decide' that society will forgive him. Shame on you fools. I hope when you fuck up that someone kicks you in the nuts too. Oh wait, they did, didn't they? THAT HAS TO BE WHY YOU ARE SO BITTER? Worrying about what the next man is doing with his private parts. Acting like you care about him. You don't give a shit about that man and you never did. Now, I have to hear Ric Bucher bellly aching about 'You can't tell Tiger anything. He is hard headed. But why should he listen to me? He is the World's best athlete!" and other tongue in cheek bullshit. smh
Oh and Ernie Els? Shut the ENTIRE FUCK UP. Your sport has suffered a 50% decline. Any PRESS YOU GET RIGHT NOW, will line your pockets. You and all the other golfers are just hot 'cause you know that by, lets say the Fall or so, all the jockeying will be done for second place. 'Cause you KNOW who is gonna come in first. If I were you, I'd hate me too- Jeezy @ what Tiger is probably thinking about all of your back biting comments. Those of you who are 'playing nice'? You might as well not do so. He is STILL gonna try to beat you and even if by chance he doesn't round back into his EXACT form, he will still be the reason that 'non golf' fans watch your sport. Deal with it.
Anyhow, the girl Jemele Hill sums up most of want to say. Sans the cussing of course. Read here:
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/commentary/news/story?page=hill/100218
I have no idea why Tiger Woods wants to waste everyone's time with this charade of a "news conference" Friday morning.
This will be the first time in months that the public has seen or heard from Woods since a bizarre one-car accident over the Thanksgiving weekend lifted the curtain on his tawdry personal life and sent him into hiding.
But if this news conference is Tiger's way of accepting responsibility for his actions, he's made a horrible miscalculation. Friday's session will come off as nothing more than a glorified public service announcement.
In a real news conference, the media can ask questions. In this one, none are allowed. A real news conference is open to all accredited media. In this one, only hand-selected members of the press get to watch as Woods reads a prepared statement into the one camera permitted in the room.
Tiger Woods
AP Photo/Eric Risberg)A simple statement to a select group of media representatives isn't likely to gain Tiger much credibility.
You don't signal to the public that you want to make amends and then construct an environment in which you're never challenged about what exactly you're making amends for. I believe I'm speaking for mothers everywhere when I say this: If you're going to do something halfway, why even bother to do it all?
Unlike a lot of people, I don't believe Woods owes the media, fans or curious onlookers an explanation about why he engaged in extramarital affairs. Woods doesn't owe the media a question-and-answer session. He doesn't owe America an embarrassing, in-depth interview with Barbara Walters, Diane Sawyer or Oprah. He doesn't owe the public any more statements on his Web site.
All he owes us is great golf. The rest we should leave to our imaginations.
But if Tiger's plan is to "address" the media so it will get off his back, this news conference certainly won't accomplish that. In fact, all it will do is make the media even more adamant in its attempts to expose Woods as a fraud.
Many of my colleagues have always hated the fact that they are at Woods' mercy when it comes to access. By holding a news conference and not allowing them to ask questions, he is rubbing the media's nose in the fact that -- despite his crumbling public image -- things are still on his terms and not the other way around.
A superstar athlete's arrogance and the media's pettiness always make for a dangerous combination. Just ask Barry Bonds. Whatever benefit of the doubt Tiger used to receive from the media should be long gone. Even if he reads the most apologetic, heartfelt statement in the history of the world on Friday, it won't satisfy some people, and more than likely the majority of the media will rip him for being too cowardly to step outside of a controlled environment.
In fact, there already is nothing for Woods to gain in the court of public opinion on Friday, because his unwillingness to answer questions already has people questioning his sincerity.
So again, why bother?
[+] EnlargeTiger Woods
AP Photo/Ng Han GuanThe shadow of his return to the PGA Tour will hover over Tiger's appearance Friday.
This ill-advised tactic shouldn't surprise anyone. Tiger has been playing this situation wrong from the beginning. One of his problems is that he is too obsessed with his public image. The only people Tiger should care about making amends with are his family and his sponsors. And that could be handled privately.
Once it was clear he wasn't severely injured in the accident outside his home, the only message Tiger should have sent is this: No matter how many women come out and claim to have slept with him, whatever is or isn't going on inside his home is none of our business.
Tiger didn't commit a crime. He didn't dishonor the game (though we can't say the same about his marriage vows). He's a public figure who cheated on his wife, and in case anyone hasn't noticed, that's been done by plenty of politicians, and by other athletes.
Tiger's best course of action has always been to return to golf as soon as possible and let everything else play itself out. His self-imposed exile seems senseless and unnecessarily dramatic. Kobe Bryant was accused of rape and potentially faced a lengthy prison term, but he held a news conference before the charges against him were dropped and admitted that he was guilty of cheating on his wife. Then he played through the turmoil. Had he disappeared like Tiger did, the scrutiny and speculation would have only intensified.
Tiger apparently didn't get that memo, and instead has made himself a hostage to the tabloids. Now he's trying to regain some control, but it's too late for that.
I understand Woods might have used this break to put some order back in his life -- there have been numerous reports that he spent part of this time seeking treatment for sex addiction -- but he seems to have forgotten that the reason he reached iconic status in the first place is because he's an excellent golfer, not because he's the husband of the year.
He should have returned to the PGA Tour long before now. Tiger's return was never going to be easy, because he isn't accustomed to such intense coverage of his off-the-course life by the tabloids and other outlets, and no matter what, some golf fans were going to find his reported behavior so offensive that they will no longer want any part of Team Tiger.
You can't please everybody, and that's just the way celebrity works. Half the people love you; the other half hate your guts. It's too bad Tiger is spending so much time concerning himself with the wrong half.
I am not really understanding who it is or why he needs to 'apologize' via this press conference. I mean, the only person(s) that he needs to apologize to is his wife. After that, there is no need. Those that don't want to roll with him anymore through the endorsement deals, the 'I love Tiger' bandwagons and such have JUMPED ship long time ago. They are already saying he can't 'get back what he lost' so what is the point of making this statement? I don't get it.
Oh wait, that's right. He needs to SUFFER. LOL All the 'perfect patties' of the world want to see him begging. Get their last kicks in before they 'decide' that society will forgive him. Shame on you fools. I hope when you fuck up that someone kicks you in the nuts too. Oh wait, they did, didn't they? THAT HAS TO BE WHY YOU ARE SO BITTER? Worrying about what the next man is doing with his private parts. Acting like you care about him. You don't give a shit about that man and you never did. Now, I have to hear Ric Bucher bellly aching about 'You can't tell Tiger anything. He is hard headed. But why should he listen to me? He is the World's best athlete!" and other tongue in cheek bullshit. smh
Oh and Ernie Els? Shut the ENTIRE FUCK UP. Your sport has suffered a 50% decline. Any PRESS YOU GET RIGHT NOW, will line your pockets. You and all the other golfers are just hot 'cause you know that by, lets say the Fall or so, all the jockeying will be done for second place. 'Cause you KNOW who is gonna come in first. If I were you, I'd hate me too- Jeezy @ what Tiger is probably thinking about all of your back biting comments. Those of you who are 'playing nice'? You might as well not do so. He is STILL gonna try to beat you and even if by chance he doesn't round back into his EXACT form, he will still be the reason that 'non golf' fans watch your sport. Deal with it.
Anyhow, the girl Jemele Hill sums up most of want to say. Sans the cussing of course. Read here:
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/commentary/news/story?page=hill/100218
I have no idea why Tiger Woods wants to waste everyone's time with this charade of a "news conference" Friday morning.
This will be the first time in months that the public has seen or heard from Woods since a bizarre one-car accident over the Thanksgiving weekend lifted the curtain on his tawdry personal life and sent him into hiding.
But if this news conference is Tiger's way of accepting responsibility for his actions, he's made a horrible miscalculation. Friday's session will come off as nothing more than a glorified public service announcement.
In a real news conference, the media can ask questions. In this one, none are allowed. A real news conference is open to all accredited media. In this one, only hand-selected members of the press get to watch as Woods reads a prepared statement into the one camera permitted in the room.
Tiger Woods
AP Photo/Eric Risberg)A simple statement to a select group of media representatives isn't likely to gain Tiger much credibility.
You don't signal to the public that you want to make amends and then construct an environment in which you're never challenged about what exactly you're making amends for. I believe I'm speaking for mothers everywhere when I say this: If you're going to do something halfway, why even bother to do it all?
Unlike a lot of people, I don't believe Woods owes the media, fans or curious onlookers an explanation about why he engaged in extramarital affairs. Woods doesn't owe the media a question-and-answer session. He doesn't owe America an embarrassing, in-depth interview with Barbara Walters, Diane Sawyer or Oprah. He doesn't owe the public any more statements on his Web site.
All he owes us is great golf. The rest we should leave to our imaginations.
But if Tiger's plan is to "address" the media so it will get off his back, this news conference certainly won't accomplish that. In fact, all it will do is make the media even more adamant in its attempts to expose Woods as a fraud.
Many of my colleagues have always hated the fact that they are at Woods' mercy when it comes to access. By holding a news conference and not allowing them to ask questions, he is rubbing the media's nose in the fact that -- despite his crumbling public image -- things are still on his terms and not the other way around.
A superstar athlete's arrogance and the media's pettiness always make for a dangerous combination. Just ask Barry Bonds. Whatever benefit of the doubt Tiger used to receive from the media should be long gone. Even if he reads the most apologetic, heartfelt statement in the history of the world on Friday, it won't satisfy some people, and more than likely the majority of the media will rip him for being too cowardly to step outside of a controlled environment.
In fact, there already is nothing for Woods to gain in the court of public opinion on Friday, because his unwillingness to answer questions already has people questioning his sincerity.
So again, why bother?
[+] EnlargeTiger Woods
AP Photo/Ng Han GuanThe shadow of his return to the PGA Tour will hover over Tiger's appearance Friday.
This ill-advised tactic shouldn't surprise anyone. Tiger has been playing this situation wrong from the beginning. One of his problems is that he is too obsessed with his public image. The only people Tiger should care about making amends with are his family and his sponsors. And that could be handled privately.
Once it was clear he wasn't severely injured in the accident outside his home, the only message Tiger should have sent is this: No matter how many women come out and claim to have slept with him, whatever is or isn't going on inside his home is none of our business.
Tiger didn't commit a crime. He didn't dishonor the game (though we can't say the same about his marriage vows). He's a public figure who cheated on his wife, and in case anyone hasn't noticed, that's been done by plenty of politicians, and by other athletes.
Tiger's best course of action has always been to return to golf as soon as possible and let everything else play itself out. His self-imposed exile seems senseless and unnecessarily dramatic. Kobe Bryant was accused of rape and potentially faced a lengthy prison term, but he held a news conference before the charges against him were dropped and admitted that he was guilty of cheating on his wife. Then he played through the turmoil. Had he disappeared like Tiger did, the scrutiny and speculation would have only intensified.
Tiger apparently didn't get that memo, and instead has made himself a hostage to the tabloids. Now he's trying to regain some control, but it's too late for that.
I understand Woods might have used this break to put some order back in his life -- there have been numerous reports that he spent part of this time seeking treatment for sex addiction -- but he seems to have forgotten that the reason he reached iconic status in the first place is because he's an excellent golfer, not because he's the husband of the year.
He should have returned to the PGA Tour long before now. Tiger's return was never going to be easy, because he isn't accustomed to such intense coverage of his off-the-course life by the tabloids and other outlets, and no matter what, some golf fans were going to find his reported behavior so offensive that they will no longer want any part of Team Tiger.
You can't please everybody, and that's just the way celebrity works. Half the people love you; the other half hate your guts. It's too bad Tiger is spending so much time concerning himself with the wrong half.
Paul Mooney....
Even I can't help but laugh at this..He is truly the first person I thought of when it came out like that.
Enjoy.
Part 1 ..
Enjoy.
Part 1 ..
I will give you #2 and then you can figure out the rest
and see if you want to click on the link. I won't even say what it is all about. You are smart. You will figure it all out...
Reason #2: Men don’t want to know
Some of my peers mistake this for men being more “trusting” than women, a theory I don’t necessarily believe. I think it’s more a case of naivite than trust. Men are the hunters. It just doesn’t’ occur to us that our woman could possibly be cheating on us. So even if reason #1 doesn’t apply and your girl has a drunken, spontaneous fling with the DJ from the boat ride, it’s the last thing we want to comprehend. She was out with the girls and that’s all we need to know.
http://theurbandaily.com/special-features/advice/5-reasons-women-dont-get-caught-cheating/ (Courtsey of The Urban Daily)
Reason #2: Men don’t want to know
Some of my peers mistake this for men being more “trusting” than women, a theory I don’t necessarily believe. I think it’s more a case of naivite than trust. Men are the hunters. It just doesn’t’ occur to us that our woman could possibly be cheating on us. So even if reason #1 doesn’t apply and your girl has a drunken, spontaneous fling with the DJ from the boat ride, it’s the last thing we want to comprehend. She was out with the girls and that’s all we need to know.
http://theurbandaily.com/special-features/advice/5-reasons-women-dont-get-caught-cheating/ (Courtsey of The Urban Daily)
(Words/Grown Folks Talk) Part 2...On: Role models/making your bed/never did it but know how..
Disclaimer: If you like to live in fantasyland, fairy tales and all of that other shit...Don't READ ANY FURTHER. We won't be doing that here. This is the raw truth. It might not be YOUR truth persay in its totality but it is the truth nonetheless.
ROLE MODELS:
I was thinking about this role model shit for some time... We need to SERIOUSLY rethink using this role model thing. It isn't working out. At all. We are picking 'human' models' and getting mad when they act...well...HUMAN. The nerve of him/her...smh Why on Earth would he dare act 'human'? Lets see. 'Cause they are HUMAN? Hmmm. Imagine that. Look, I understand the need to have people to emulate and all of that, I really do. But you should be teaching your kids to decipher the good and the bad and how to learn from both. That,"I only want my kids to know the good things about him so he needs to be good at all times for my sake" is a MAJOR COPOUT. Selfish bastards..I don't know about you, but I am thinking that if you only learn the good things how are you going to be able to cope with the bad things in life? Oh that's right, my bad. Bad things only happen to bad people and you are not a bad person. Fuck outta here with that bullshit....That is what is wrong with people now. Living in fantasy land. Ole candy ass people..

TMZ got ya'll thinking 'we have the right to know' shit. No WE DO NOT. I could see if we were INVOLVED in the situation or were gonna be able to help him. We are none of the above. Just nosy bystanders looking for the next trainwreck. We don't have a right to know anything but about whatever ability said person displays that puts them in said spotlight. He is a golfer. If you wanna go in on something, go in on that. Oh that's right, YOU CAN'T. That fool is the best golfer in the World arguably. When his golf game takes a SEVERE nose dive, talk about that.
Now I gotta hear all types of bullshit from people who quite frankly, AREN'T IN A RELATIONSHIP AT THE MOMENT, have a REALLY bad track record (and openly complain about it) all the time or are not married. It has sparked all types of stupid debates/comments/trending topics and 'status updates. Single people getting mad at married people again. Married people acting brand new like they don't know the 'codes' to the shit. Calling it idiotic yet giving advice on how they would do it at the same time. Saying what he should do. Saying what she should do. Really? I mean if it is not for you, it isn't for you. No problem. But the bashing? Really? Stop that childish shit.
"And as for the critics, tell me I don't get it
Everybody can tell you how to do it, they never did it" - Jay-Z Already Home
^^^^That pretty much sums up how I feel about alladat^^^^^^ Yes, I know not EVERYONE learns over time and all of that happy shit but I will tell you what. I am going to ask the person who has done it or is CURRENTLY doing it (who will tell it like it is) rather than some person that I 'like'. That is some of you peoples problem now. Seeking out the wrong advice 'cause of the source because the source is 'not like you'. Not young. Not 'hip'. Not in your lil 'circle'. Some cat who has NEVER DONE IT. How's that working out for you? I already know how it is working out for you. You complain about it everyday in my time lines and shit on the Net. If you think I am talking to you then I AM TALKING TO YOU TOO.
He shoulda just told her he wanted an open relationship..
Yeah, 'cause she was down for that probably and he was just an idiot for not asking. Why I oughta.....Dumb ass. No YOU woulda went for that. You are putting your ideas on 'her' again! You are not her and she is not you! First of all, SHE WOULD HAVE TO WANT THAT you idiot. If she doesn't want that then even if he asks and she says 'yes', all it will be is her placating him..You TELL ME how that is gonna end up ole super genius? I'll take not well for a thousand, Alex....
My favorite though is this one. "Men aren't shit..."
Yeah, 'cause he and all the other dudes were fucking themselves. @ those involved with other women. Miss me with the deflective shield responses to that too. "Well, it isn't the other parties relationship. It is his."/"It is the dudes that mess up..." "Men ain't shit." and the other responses that put the onus SOLELY on the dude. Talk about excuses! . If you are wrong, you are wrong. Period. Men and women. Last I checked, most of these women EVEN HAVE HAD BFS/FIANCEES/ and (gasp) husbands too that fool around with dudes. So it seems to me, we aren't the only ones with a lil trouble keeping it in our pants now are we? Some of ya'll have a REAL ISSUE with not riding on poles that don't belong to you. It is like you see the pole and JUST HAVE TO RIDE IT. But we are the ones with the 'ego' issues..Chile please- Ocho Cinco
He made his bed...He has to lay in it...
I agree actually if he stays. Of course there is a limit but I am not here to set all of that. Here is what I don't like though...Some of you people seem to think that people don't do this or that you saying it makes it 'better' somehow. THEY DO. All the time. I tell you I don't know too many men who have not 'sat there and ate every bit of criticism that they have gotten for fucking up'. Laid in their bed that they made by staying around in marriages (and relationships), taking the 'shade' that they get. Taking the 'checking of email', the COMPLETE RUNDOWNS of their daily schedule, the 'pop up visits' when they say they are going to their boys house and all of that shit. (Oh yeah, we ARE GONNA TALK ABOUT THIS SHIT TODAY. Fuck that!)Women too! They have done it just as well. That 'possessive' mate you don't like that your friend has (whom you have helped 'creep' on many an occasions but he 'don't know about all that'. Yeah her..)? There is a reason why he is like that. He knows what it is. Trust me. That intuition thing is not exclusive to ya'll. Trust me. Why do you think that your 'favorite' uncle/auntie can't make a damm move WITHOUT YOUR OTHER RELATIVE knowing their every move even though they have been together for 40 some years? Oh, you thought it was because they 'loved' them like that and they have a perfect relationship huh? You idiot! You are a fool. No, motherfucker, someone fucked up probably. Shit, probably BOTH OF 'EM truthfully. Ask around and actually listen to the context clues. Ask your 'cool' relative sometime. They might let you in on some shit. It will all make sense. Why do you think that older people just 'chuckle' when we younger people get all up in arms about this stupid shit? 'Cause this shit HAS BEEN GOING ON YA'LL. I heard someone say it is the 'year of the sidepiece'. No. We just get the info a lil sooner now. That's all. Been going on. My beef with my elders is that they didn't tell me SOONER. Coulda saved me some bullshit on all sides, including me from my own bullshit. (Oh you thought I wasn't gonna get real with it didn't you?) Yeah, thank me later...So if that man decides to rearrange that 'nup or not, who am I to say shit about it? For those of you have wondered why people 'bounce' after they get caught up, re-read what I just wrote. It should all make sense now. It gets THAT HECTIC and honestly, you can't blame folks for a lil bit if that is how they act. I won't put up the lil cliches and stuff. You know them well. @ the bonds broken and all of that.
Now before you just jump to the conclusion that I am saying the boy was right/justified/or any of that fagazzi shit, RE-READ what I typed. Not all. I just know that nothing is black and white like many of you would love it to be. There are other things to look at and I am a lil tired of seeing people using these events to spew their own lil brand of one sided hatred about things that have happened in their past with men, relationships in general or any of that stuff.
This is just one of the many tweets that sum up what I am saying...
RT @215tayyib: fact = people cheat + have sex, Politicians, Clergymen, Rabbi's, Imam's, Athletes, Celebrities and your neighbor...
I don't have to get off my soapbox 'cause I was laying down when I typed this shit...You FIGURE out what I mean when I say that. Nor do I expect you to agree with me. Do what you do dammit. Agree or not. No sweat offa my back. Ya heard?
ROLE MODELS:
I was thinking about this role model shit for some time... We need to SERIOUSLY rethink using this role model thing. It isn't working out. At all. We are picking 'human' models' and getting mad when they act...well...HUMAN. The nerve of him/her...smh Why on Earth would he dare act 'human'? Lets see. 'Cause they are HUMAN? Hmmm. Imagine that. Look, I understand the need to have people to emulate and all of that, I really do. But you should be teaching your kids to decipher the good and the bad and how to learn from both. That,"I only want my kids to know the good things about him so he needs to be good at all times for my sake" is a MAJOR COPOUT. Selfish bastards..I don't know about you, but I am thinking that if you only learn the good things how are you going to be able to cope with the bad things in life? Oh that's right, my bad. Bad things only happen to bad people and you are not a bad person. Fuck outta here with that bullshit....That is what is wrong with people now. Living in fantasy land. Ole candy ass people..
TMZ got ya'll thinking 'we have the right to know' shit. No WE DO NOT. I could see if we were INVOLVED in the situation or were gonna be able to help him. We are none of the above. Just nosy bystanders looking for the next trainwreck. We don't have a right to know anything but about whatever ability said person displays that puts them in said spotlight. He is a golfer. If you wanna go in on something, go in on that. Oh that's right, YOU CAN'T. That fool is the best golfer in the World arguably. When his golf game takes a SEVERE nose dive, talk about that.
Now I gotta hear all types of bullshit from people who quite frankly, AREN'T IN A RELATIONSHIP AT THE MOMENT, have a REALLY bad track record (and openly complain about it) all the time or are not married. It has sparked all types of stupid debates/comments/trending topics and 'status updates. Single people getting mad at married people again. Married people acting brand new like they don't know the 'codes' to the shit. Calling it idiotic yet giving advice on how they would do it at the same time. Saying what he should do. Saying what she should do. Really? I mean if it is not for you, it isn't for you. No problem. But the bashing? Really? Stop that childish shit.
"And as for the critics, tell me I don't get it
Everybody can tell you how to do it, they never did it" - Jay-Z Already Home
^^^^That pretty much sums up how I feel about alladat^^^^^^ Yes, I know not EVERYONE learns over time and all of that happy shit but I will tell you what. I am going to ask the person who has done it or is CURRENTLY doing it (who will tell it like it is) rather than some person that I 'like'. That is some of you peoples problem now. Seeking out the wrong advice 'cause of the source because the source is 'not like you'. Not young. Not 'hip'. Not in your lil 'circle'. Some cat who has NEVER DONE IT. How's that working out for you? I already know how it is working out for you. You complain about it everyday in my time lines and shit on the Net. If you think I am talking to you then I AM TALKING TO YOU TOO.
He shoulda just told her he wanted an open relationship..
Yeah, 'cause she was down for that probably and he was just an idiot for not asking. Why I oughta.....Dumb ass. No YOU woulda went for that. You are putting your ideas on 'her' again! You are not her and she is not you! First of all, SHE WOULD HAVE TO WANT THAT you idiot. If she doesn't want that then even if he asks and she says 'yes', all it will be is her placating him..You TELL ME how that is gonna end up ole super genius? I'll take not well for a thousand, Alex....
My favorite though is this one. "Men aren't shit..."
Yeah, 'cause he and all the other dudes were fucking themselves. @ those involved with other women. Miss me with the deflective shield responses to that too. "Well, it isn't the other parties relationship. It is his."/"It is the dudes that mess up..." "Men ain't shit." and the other responses that put the onus SOLELY on the dude. Talk about excuses! . If you are wrong, you are wrong. Period. Men and women. Last I checked, most of these women EVEN HAVE HAD BFS/FIANCEES/ and (gasp) husbands too that fool around with dudes. So it seems to me, we aren't the only ones with a lil trouble keeping it in our pants now are we? Some of ya'll have a REAL ISSUE with not riding on poles that don't belong to you. It is like you see the pole and JUST HAVE TO RIDE IT. But we are the ones with the 'ego' issues..Chile please- Ocho Cinco
He made his bed...He has to lay in it...
I agree actually if he stays. Of course there is a limit but I am not here to set all of that. Here is what I don't like though...Some of you people seem to think that people don't do this or that you saying it makes it 'better' somehow. THEY DO. All the time. I tell you I don't know too many men who have not 'sat there and ate every bit of criticism that they have gotten for fucking up'. Laid in their bed that they made by staying around in marriages (and relationships), taking the 'shade' that they get. Taking the 'checking of email', the COMPLETE RUNDOWNS of their daily schedule, the 'pop up visits' when they say they are going to their boys house and all of that shit. (Oh yeah, we ARE GONNA TALK ABOUT THIS SHIT TODAY. Fuck that!)Women too! They have done it just as well. That 'possessive' mate you don't like that your friend has (whom you have helped 'creep' on many an occasions but he 'don't know about all that'. Yeah her..)? There is a reason why he is like that. He knows what it is. Trust me. That intuition thing is not exclusive to ya'll. Trust me. Why do you think that your 'favorite' uncle/auntie can't make a damm move WITHOUT YOUR OTHER RELATIVE knowing their every move even though they have been together for 40 some years? Oh, you thought it was because they 'loved' them like that and they have a perfect relationship huh? You idiot! You are a fool. No, motherfucker, someone fucked up probably. Shit, probably BOTH OF 'EM truthfully. Ask around and actually listen to the context clues. Ask your 'cool' relative sometime. They might let you in on some shit. It will all make sense. Why do you think that older people just 'chuckle' when we younger people get all up in arms about this stupid shit? 'Cause this shit HAS BEEN GOING ON YA'LL. I heard someone say it is the 'year of the sidepiece'. No. We just get the info a lil sooner now. That's all. Been going on. My beef with my elders is that they didn't tell me SOONER. Coulda saved me some bullshit on all sides, including me from my own bullshit. (Oh you thought I wasn't gonna get real with it didn't you?) Yeah, thank me later...So if that man decides to rearrange that 'nup or not, who am I to say shit about it? For those of you have wondered why people 'bounce' after they get caught up, re-read what I just wrote. It should all make sense now. It gets THAT HECTIC and honestly, you can't blame folks for a lil bit if that is how they act. I won't put up the lil cliches and stuff. You know them well. @ the bonds broken and all of that.
Now before you just jump to the conclusion that I am saying the boy was right/justified/or any of that fagazzi shit, RE-READ what I typed. Not all. I just know that nothing is black and white like many of you would love it to be. There are other things to look at and I am a lil tired of seeing people using these events to spew their own lil brand of one sided hatred about things that have happened in their past with men, relationships in general or any of that stuff.
This is just one of the many tweets that sum up what I am saying...
RT @215tayyib: fact = people cheat + have sex, Politicians, Clergymen, Rabbi's, Imam's, Athletes, Celebrities and your neighbor...
I don't have to get off my soapbox 'cause I was laying down when I typed this shit...You FIGURE out what I mean when I say that. Nor do I expect you to agree with me. Do what you do dammit. Agree or not. No sweat offa my back. Ya heard?











